Tensions between Cambodia and Thailand continue to simmer despite a ceasefire agreement established in December aimed at maintaining peace along their shared border. The two nations had agreed to keep their military positions and ensure the safe return of civilians displaced by previous clashes. However, controversy remains over the implications of the ceasefire on the long-standing border dispute.
Cambodia’s Information Minister, Neth Pheaktra, has emphasized that the ceasefire should not be interpreted as a means to determine the legal ownership of the contested territories. According to Pheaktra, the agreement, effective since December 27, is solely intended to maintain the status quo and not to influence the eventual determination of the international border.
The situation on the ground remains tense, with Pheaktra accusing Thai forces of fortifying their positions in areas claimed by Cambodia. He alleges that Thailand has been installing barbed wire, digging trenches, and constructing military facilities, which Cambodia views as an attempt to alter the status quo rather than simply maintaining existing positions.
The conflict has already displaced more than 20,000 people, a figure cited by Cambodian officials. Pheaktra insists that the successful return of these civilians should be a crucial indicator of compliance with the ceasefire terms. The humanitarian aspect of the ceasefire is seen as essential to its legitimacy and effectiveness.
Meanwhile, Thailand has been engaging the international community by taking foreign delegates, ASEAN observers, and international journalists to disputed areas such as the O’Smach casino area and the Choam crossing. During these visits, Thailand presented claims regarding the use of casino buildings and alleged cross-border criminal activities, which Cambodia disputes, asserting that these territories rightfully belong to them.